Ancient paper that is writing The ancient criteria for clinical writing

Ancient paper that is writing The ancient criteria for clinical writing

Abstract

The clinical paper has been developed within the last three hundreds of years into an instrument to communicate the outcomes of clinical inquiry. Scientific writing will need to have of the standard that is high its related to the entire process of gaining knowledge for the learned additionally as brand new learners. In ancient age, specific writing methodology ended up being used because of the boffins to organize standard and highly-scientific manuscripts into the industry. Tools such as Tantrayukti (techniques for writing/decoding treatise), Tachchhilya (inclinations), Kalpana (compositions), etc., have now been described into the classics to steadfastly keep up the product quality requirements of systematic literary works. As a result of well-established writing practices, medical literatures such as for instance Samhita (Ayurvedic texts), Samgrahagrantha (compendia), Nighantu (lexicons), etc., had been written uniformly and top quality literary works had been created. The faculties of good writing that is scientific Shastra (treatise) have now been described within the Vimanasthana of Charaka Samhita which will be called Tantraguna. The Tantraguna covers the important thing points associated with the composing such as language, order, size, technique, etc. After reviewing and analyzing these Tantraguna, it could be figured the writing that is ancient may be compared to some aspect to present introduction, techniques, outcomes and conversation framework of medical writing. This analysis may make it possible to enable and bolster the present requirements of systematic writing by modifying new areas of ancient writing method.

Keyword Phrases: Charaka Samhita, Tantraguna, Vimanasthana

how exactly to cite this short article:
Vyas HA, Panara K. Tantraguna – The criteria that are ancient clinical writing. AYU 2016;37:158-62

How to cite this URL:
Vyas HA, Panara K. Tantraguna – The criteria that are ancient systematic writing. AYU serial online 2016 cited 2019 Aug 2;37:158-62. Offered by:

Introduction

Composing is a really essential element of technology; it really is utilized to report and communicate tips, tasks and findings to other people. Medical writing can simply just just take numerous types from the laboratory notebook to a project report and from a paper within an educational log to a write-up in a systematic mag. 1 Good writing requires just as much care and thought whilst the experiments or researches which are performed. Composing an investigation paper or review article or text for medical science just isn’t a task that is simple. Nowadays, as scientific studies are necessary for every industry of technology, its writing technique calls for uniformity with its presentation for clear interaction. Scientific documents must clearly be written and concisely to ensure visitors with back ground just like the writer can realize easily just exactly what he previously done and exactly how he previously done. Presently, many directions are around for systematic writing but introduction, practices, results and conversation (IMRAD) structure 2 is more medical and popular in scientist community. While writing a study article, only facts should always be mentioned with proof that should be according to careful findings. But, in literary research, hypothetical writing could be permissible but again it should be supported with strong and authentic traditional recommendations or very very very carefully gathered genuine big information. Construction, style, language, and general presentation of ideas will also be a few of the essential aspects to be viewed for composing a quality paper that is good.

In ancient age, literatures of varied areas have already been written in Samskrit language. Further, similarity on paper types of texts of every field suggested that uniform methodology that is writing used by the ancient boffins to organize standard and highly-scientific manuscripts. Information on such methodology are located in Charaka Samhita, among the textbooks of ancient science that is medical. Composer of the writing, Acharya Charaka described composing methodology while describing the choice criteria for top-quality manuscript to a scholar that is new. 3 In this critical review, Tantraguna have already been put together from Charaka Samhita; further, it absolutely compare and contrast essay ideas was interpreted and weighed against current tools of this writing that is scientific.

TAG:2Tantraguna: The Traits Of Good Scientific Writing/TAG:2

Tantraguna happen described in 8 chapter that is th of of Charaka Samhita. “Vimanasthana” section had been written for the determination that is quantitative of certain characteristics of treatment such as for instance Rasa, Dravya, Dosha and Vikara. 4 The chapter that is eighth of relates to the dedication of this particular demands to treat conditions. 5 In the beginning of the chapter, scholars are advised when it comes to choice of a typical text that is medical good writing. To facilitate the choice, Acharya Charaka described the traits of good writing that is scientific are elaborated as Tantraguna. Every single Tantraguna is furnished and interpreted as follows.

Sumahat (well comprehensive)

Composing ought to be comprehensive. It must protect most of the necessary facets of the subject. Right Here, additionally it is become taken into account that in line with the structure for the article, size might be determined. On the period of the manuscript, Vriddha Vagbhatta opines so it should neither too lengthy nor too brief. 6 This can be a criterion for research article or paper that is scientific or a novel; writer should cover all of the aspects with crucial details.

Yashasvi-Dheera-Purusha-Sevita and Apta-pujita (accepted by clinical fraternity)

Text which will be getting used by qualified, experienced people for the same industry should be looked at authentic. This characteristic shows that the main topic of text ought to be popular in clinical community as well as its applicability and acceptability of real information in keeping training is high.

Arthabahulam (fine interpreted)

The writing should expose broad and accurate interpretations by a restricted amount of terms. This content associated with topic should immensely be concise and significant. For structure of succinct and matter that is precise ancient writers of Ayurveda utilized some methodology to facilitate simple transmission, equally very theraputic for all. The definitions underlying the writing can be interpreted with due regards towards the axioms of elaboration (Nirdesha) and decrease (Uddesha). 7

Trividha Shishya Buddhihitam (clearly expressed)

Literary concept of this particular feature is the fact that the treatise must certanly be similarly suited to the knowledge of three types of pupils, in other terms. extremely smart, moderate and low. This implies that medical paper should really be demonstrably expressed, effortlessly understandable and appealable to all or any kinds of people pertaining to field that is particular.e. from very intellectuals on track.

Apagata Punarukta Dosha (no repetition of content or without plagiarism)

Systematic writing must certanly be clear of repetition regarding the topic. Hence, repetition of subject in same or sentences that are different paper resulting in enhance associated with the wide range of pages is recognized as poor of work. “Punarukta Dosha” might also suggest toward plagiarism. Utilizing other scientists’ tips or any areas of their writing as the very very very own is just a severe offense understood as plagiarism. Hence, Tantraguna additionally implies that information mentioned into the research really should not be copied from earlier in the day research works.

Learn ought to be carried out and evaluated by impartial, genuine, and medical person. Bias 8 might be raised from any conflict of great interest in experiments or by research carried out through nonscientific methods. Both types of bias resulted in generation of false and data that are unscientific. Ergo, scholar must be well loaded with thorough familiarity with particular industry and really should have no conflict.